How a reviewer check the quality of your manuscript

Reviewer 审稿的标准

horizontal rule

1. Do the research and the results present a significant new advance to a clearly identified technological problem or scientific question?

2. Are the objectives of the research clearly defined, and is the research in line with the objectives?

3. Is the introduction clearly presented, and confined to the research objective?

4. Are the experimental methods appropriate, and are they described clearly and with sufficient details for the work to be repeatable?

5. Are the data quantitative, understandable, and presented clearly?

6. Is the statistical treatment of the data adequate?

7. Are the results and conclusions clearly presented and do they support the claims made by the authors?

8. Is the discussion integrated with the results, clearly presented and confined to the research data?

9. Are the language, grammar, and style of high standard?

10. Are the figures and tables of high quality?

11. Does the title adequately reflect the content of the manuscript?

12. Can the abstract be understood on its own and does it contain the relevant facts?

13. Are the most relevant references all cited, can unnecessary or marginally relevant references be omitted?


服务热线:0531-88011879  E-mail:
Copyright 2013 Sciwriting Scientific Writing Solutions all rights reserved